Key Claim Dismissed in Oklahoma Poultry Litter Lawsuit

December 17, 2009

A federal judge has dismissed one of Oklahoma’s key claims in the state’s pollution lawsuit against Arkansas poultry companies.

U.S. District Judge Greg Frizzell on Dec. 15 ruled that bird manure isn’t “solid waste” under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976.

Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson says the loss of the federal claim is “serious” and that he plans to appeal the ruling to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The lawsuit filed by Edmondson in 2005 claims the poultry companies are responsible for polluting the Illinois River watershed with poultry litter. The poultry companies deny any wrongdoing and claim the manure is property of their contract growers who use it is a cheap fertilizer.

The trial in the AG’s case against 11 companies — including food giants Tyson Foods Inc. and Cargill Inc. — began in September.

Topics Lawsuits Oklahoma

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • January 1, 2010 at 11:39 am
    Shane says:
    The line of reasoning that Al is using is indeed flawed!!! A person who eats an organic chicken is still eating a chicken. It pooped somewhere while it was alive...the phosp... read more
  • December 18, 2009 at 9:23 am
    spins says:
    Hey Al, saw the movie, amazing! We won't eat certain foods or at certain places any longer. Purchased two copies as xmas presents to give to our kids! What a mess!
  • December 18, 2009 at 7:03 am
    Still Confused says:
    Poop from organic chickens is healthier for us and does not contain fecal matter? Pretty ridiculous reach! Have you ever seen a cage free operation? Give me my eggs and poultr... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (6)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features