ACIC Opposes Dog Liability Bill

May 3, 2004

The Association of California Insurance Companies (ACIC) is opposing legislation that would require homeowner policies to insure – and accept the liability – of all dogs and every breed, regardless of their vicious propensities.

“Each year an alarming number of vicious injuries and fatal attacks against humans are attributed to certain breeds of dogs. There are breeds that can bite with a force averaging 1,000 pounds per square inch, while others can bite with twice that force, enough to mutilate a child or adult in seconds,” said Sam Sorich, president of ACIC.

“The oftentimes unprovoked and fierce nature of attacks further supports the insurance companies’ right to incorporate such information into their risk assessment,” Sorich added.

The bill, AB 2399 by Assemblywoman Carol Lui (D-La Canada), would prohibit insurers from refusing to issue or renew homeowner policies based upon the breed of dog residing in the dwelling. The bill is scheduled to be heard by the Assembly Insurance Committee May 5.

Sorich pointed out that the Humane Society of the United States reports that some $1 billion is paid each year in insurance liability claims based on dog bites. More than 4.7 million Americans suffer dog bites each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Children are three times more likely to require medical treatment for dog bites. And, the vast majority of those children are bitten on the face, neck and head, requiring plastic and reconstructive surgery,” said Sorich, noting there are 18 deaths on average every year from dog bites.

“We understand the intent of the proposed legislation – to avoid the assumption that a dog may be vicious merely because of breed. However, with some breeds representing an unusually high risk, insurers must be able to make the determination whether or not they can take on the risk.”

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • May 5, 2004 at 11:55 am
    Cindy Dreaher says:
    I agree with Sue, there should be an exclusion that will stand up in court. The responsibility should fall on the homeowner. Most communities have a leash law and most of the ... read more
  • May 5, 2004 at 8:04 am
    Sue says:
    I am a CSR in New York and deal with this issue on a every day basis. Most of our standard companies have developed a hot "dog" list where they won't write certain breeds of... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (2)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features