California lawmakers passed legislation to help utility giant PG&E Corp. pay for billions of dollars in potential liabilities from wildfires that ravaged Northern California wine country last year.
The state Assembly and Senate approved a wide-ranging plan Friday that includes directing regulators to limit how much PG&E shareholders would cover from the 2017 fires that killed dozens of people. The bill now heads to the desk of Governor Jerry Brown, who has supported helping PG&E dodge fiscal distress.
The move is a key victory for PG&E, which may owe as much as $17.3 billion from the blazes. The utility owner raised the prospect of bankruptcy as it lobbied lawmakers for help and has lost more than $11 billion in market value in the last year. While the bill doesn’t go as far as PG&E wanted toward alleviating its liabilities, it could help ease Wall Street’s concerns.
The bill “is a common-sense solution that puts the needs of wildfire victims first, better equips California to prevent and respond to wildfires, protects electric customers and preserves progress toward California’s clean energy goals,” PG&E said in a statement.
The measure would allow PG&E to sell bonds backed by customer bills to cover costs from last year’s wildfires if regulators determine the utility incurred those expenses by acting in a reasonable manner.
If regulators decide PG&E didn’t act reasonably and has to cover fire costs on their own, regulators would have to conduct a stress test to determine how much the utility can pay without going bankrupt. PG&E could charge ratepayers for costs above that amount, even if those expenses were due to negligent behavior.
The legislation provides “watered-down relief for utilities,” said Thomas Claps, a research analyst for Susquehanna Financial Group, in a research note before Friday’s vote.
California investigators have already named PG&E power lines and other equipment as the source of 16 fires last year. In 11 of those instances, investigators said they found evidence that PG&E violated safety laws. Officials haven’t released the results of a probe into the most destructive of the 2017 California wildfires, which combined destroyed thousands of homes and killed 44 people.
PG&E was joined by other California utilities in lobbying lawmakers for financial help in the face of what they say is a growing threat from wildfires. Brown had proposed relaxing a state law that holds utilities liable for damages if their equipment is found to have caused a blaze, even if they followed safety rules. But lawmakers rejected that idea.
In addition to allowing utilities to float bonds to cover wildfire costs, the bill headed to the governor’s desk calls for improved forest management and increased utility spending on grid infrastructure. Backers say it strikes a balance between protecting ratepayers and shielding PG&E from financial harm.
“This is about protecting ratepayers, not helping utilities,” State Senator Bill Dodd, a Democrat from Napa and co-chair of the conference committee, said in a statement before the vote. “The fact of the matter is ratepayers would be hurt in a utility bankruptcy.”
Critics, on the other hand, said the bill amounted to a giveaway to PG&E.
“This is a bailout in sheep’s clothing,” said Mark Toney, executive director of the Utility Reform Network, before the vote. “PG&E gets to bill for costs resulting from negligent and even criminal behavior.”
- California’s Plan to Help Utilities Deal With Fire Costs
- California’s Plan for PG&E Bonds to Cover Fire Damages in Final Stages
- Changes in California Fire-Liability Law Looking Less Likely
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.