Insurer Group Hammers Claim that California Prop 103 Saved Drivers Billions

October 17, 2018

The insurance industry is taking exception to a new report commemorating the 30th anniversary of one of California’s primary auto insurance laws that claims the law has saved drivers billions of dollars.

The Consumer Federation of America reported on Wednesday that Proposition 103, the insurance reform law passed by California voters in 1988, has saved drivers $154 billion on their auto insurance and that the law has lowered auto liability premiums in California by 5.7 percent since 1989, even as liability premiums rose across the rest of the country.

Mark Sektnan, vice president of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, says it wasn’t Prop 103 that saved Californians all that money but other reforms that have been made since then.

“California has a healthy and competitive auto insurance market despite Prop. 103,” Sektnan said. “The exorbitant liability and auto insurance costs plaguing California in the 1980s, which drove passage of Prop 103, were reduced through court decisions, stronger highway safety laws, increased seat belt usage, and safer car manufacturing.”

He added that “No other state has adopted the same anti-competitive, restrictive regulatory system as Prop 103 since it was enacted in 1988.”

According to Sektnan insurers routinely work to keep auto insurance costs lower by advocating for auto safety laws, controlling liability costs, and keeping auto body repair rates under control.

“It is these actions to reduce underlying costs that have provided benefits to Californians, not Prop. 103,” he added.

The CFA credited the savings and stability of rates to the provisions in Prop 103 that require insurance companies to justify and get approval for rate increases, allow the public to challenge unfair insurance company practices and excessive rates, and that made the insurance commissioner an elected post. Californians will elect a new insurance commissioner next month.

“Three decades ago, California voters joined together with tens of thousands of small donations to put Proposition 103 on the ballot and pass it, despite an unprecedented $63 million campaign of lies and deception by the insurance industry,” Harvey Rosenfield, the author of Proposition 103 and the founder of Consumer Watchdog, said in a statement. “$154 billion is a 30th birthday gift from Prop 103 to the people of California, rewarding a battle against insurance company overcharges and abuses that has been waged every day for the last three decades.”

The CFA study showed that:

  • Californians have saved $154 billion, or $6 billion a year, since Prop 103 took effect in 1989 compared to what premiums would have been had they followed the national average growth rate.
  • Auto insurance liability premiums, excluding comprehensive and collision coverage, went down 7 percent in California since 1989; during the same period, liability premiums went up 58.5 percent nationwide.
  • Californians spent just $93.48 more on auto insurance in 2015 than they did in 1989; nationwide drivers spent $352.71 more.

Proposition 103 was passed by California voters on Nov. 8, 1988. Among other provisions, Prop 103 requires that auto insurance rates be based primarily on a driver’s safety record, miles driven and driving experience. It requires all automobile rating factors be approved by the California Department of Insurance and prohibits rating factors like credit score, ZIP Code and race.

Related:

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Advertisers

Latest Comments

  • January 30, 2020 at 10:45 pm
    Robert says:
    I also work in the insurance industry and have seen the differences that prop 103 has made in the California insurance market. I'd hardly call these differences or changes po... read more
  • October 18, 2018 at 6:17 pm
    Mike says:
    I've worked in the industry, primarily property-casualty underwriting, and on the government/regulatory side for over 15 years. I've handled insurance in 46 of the 50 states.... read more
  • October 18, 2018 at 11:12 am
    blu lightning says:
    One of the worst things that happened to CA. Before Prop 103, EVERYONE wanted to be in and compete in that state. Rates were not bad relative to other states. What made CA dif... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (3)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features