Clinton Plan Would Cut Tax Benefit for Foreign Insurers Competing for U.S. Business

April 21, 2008

Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, as part of a broad plan to boost the fortunes of U.S. workers, if elected would clamp down on tax benefits to foreign insurers doing business in the United States, she said.

Under a plan referred to as an “insourcing” agenda released April 2, Clinton proposed a wide range of initiatives to create $7 billion a year in new tax benefits and investments for firms that create U.S. jobs, and to help domestic insurers by cutting a benefit to foreign insurers.

Specifically, Clinton would “eliminate the unfair advantage that foreign insurers located in tax havens have against U.S. insurers competing for U.S. business,” according to a statement.

Brian Deese, a Clinton economic adviser, said at issue is the ability of foreign insurance companies writing business in the United States to cut their tax bill through reinsurance arrangements in a “tax haven.”

Clinton added the issue to her agenda as a coalition of U.S. insurers ramps up its effort to convince legislators to close what they call a tax loophole that allows foreign insurers with U.S. operations to cut their income tax through offshore reinsurance arrangements.

“The Coalition for a Domestic Insurance Industry” is a 14-member group that includes W.R. Berkley Corp., Ambac Financial Group Inc., American Financial Group Inc, Berkshire Hathaway, the Chubb Corp., EMC Insurance Cos., MBIA Inc. and Hartford Financial Services Group.

In a letter last year to the House Ways and Means Committee, the coalition called on legislators to adjust the tax code that applies to certain transactions involving the U.S. operations of foreign insurers or there would be a risk that “foreign domiciled insurers will continue to use their tax advantage to gain a greater share of the U.S. insurance market.”

Coalition spokesman William Berkley told Reuters in an earlier interview that his group proposes a change to “level the playing field” between U.S. insurers and foreign companies with U.S. operations, so “the tax rate (would) be adjusted so they are taxed more appropriately on (their) domestic business.”

Topics USA Carriers

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal West April 21, 2008
April 21, 2008
Insurance Journal West Magazine

Top 100 Retail Agencies; Medical Professional Liability; Top Performing P/C Insurers: 1Q