New Jersey Teen Hurt in Stolen Auto Denied Medical Benefits

March 9, 2009

New Jersey’s Supreme Court said a passenger in a stolen vehicle can’t collect medical benefits under an auto insurance policy, even if the person doesn’t know the vehicle was stolen.

Last week’s 5-2 ruling, which overturned an appellate court, upholds a plain reading of an exclusion under auto insurance policies. It denies coverage to someone who is in or driving a vehicle without the permission of the owner or other named insured.

The case involved a 14-year-old East Orange boy who suffered a broken leg and other injuries in an October 2004 accident.

His grandmother, with whom he was living, tried to collect medical benefits under personal injury protection coverage. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. denied the claim.

Topics Fraud Auto New Jersey

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • March 10, 2009 at 6:21 am
    Mary B. says:
    A Court with common sense. Maybe this is that change we all have been hearing about. On a side note, I highly doubt the little 14 y/o criminal did not know the vehicle was sto... read more
  • March 9, 2009 at 2:25 am
    caffiend says:
    If there's any $ remedy that needs to be sought. They should look to the driver of the stolen auto for reimbursement. Presumably HE knew it was stolen.
  • March 9, 2009 at 1:17 am
    Alan says:
    Good decision. When you make a decision to step outside of society's laws, you should forfeit all of your rights and protections.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features